Q: You create a new project roadmap that is visually appealing and contains all the information for the stakeholders to reference. However, this document took a lot of time to create and has caused some delays in the timeline. Which of the following roadmap pitfalls does this scenario represent?
or
Q: You draft a brand-new project roadmap that is eye-catching and includes all the details the stakeholders need to know. But the creation of this document took a long time, and it has caused some delays in the schedule. Which of the following represents a pitfalls in the roadmap?
- Putting more work into it than the deliverables
- Pressuring teams to improve deadlines
- Pressuring teams to achieve deadlines no matter what
- Putting less work into it than the deliverables
Explanation: The issue associated with generating a roadmap that is known as “Over-Engineering” describes a situation in which the creation of a project roadmap that is visually attractive requires a lot of time and causes delays in the deadline. When there is an excessive or needless investment of time, money, or complexity in the creation of a roadmap or other project documents, this practice is known as over-engineering, and it may cause delays in the timetables for project completion.
In this particular instance, the emphasis placed on making the roadmap seem visually attractive may have led to an increase in the amount of time spent above what was required, which may have caused a delay in the overall execution of the project. It is essential to strike a balance between the requirements for effective communication and visual attractiveness, as well as the necessity to make optimal use of project resources and stick to established deadlines. The delivery of the project on time might be impacted negatively if an excessive focus is placed on aesthetics or other things that are not required.
